Structural Decompositions for Problems with Global Constraints

A wide range of problems can be modelled as constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs), that is, a set of constraints that must be satisfied simultaneously. Constraints can either be represented extensionally, by explicitly listing allowed combinations of values, or implicitly, by special-purpose algorithms provided by a solver. Such implicitly represented constraints, known as global constraints, are widely used; indeed, they are one of the key reasons for the success of constraint programming in solving real-world problems. In recent years, a variety of restrictions on the structure of CSP instances have been shown to yield tractable classes of CSPs. However, most such restrictions fail to guarantee tractability for CSPs with global constraints. We therefore study the applicability of structural restrictions to instances with such constraints. We show that when the number of solutions to a CSP instance is bounded in key parts of the problem, structural restrictions can be used to derive new tractable classes. Furthermore, we show that this result extends to combinations of instances drawn from known tractable classes, as well as to CSP instances where constraints assign costs to satisfying assignments.Comment: The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10601-015-9181-

On Equivalence and Cores for Incomplete Databases in Open and Closed Worlds

Data exchange heavily relies on the notion of incomplete database instances. Several semantics for such instances have been proposed and include open (OWA), closed (CWA), and open-closed (OCWA) world. For all these semantics important questions are: whether one incomplete instance semantically implies another; when two are semantically equivalent; and whether a smaller or smallest semantically equivalent instance exists. For OWA and CWA these questions are fully answered. For several variants of OCWA, however, they remain open. In this work we adress these questions for Closed Powerset semantics and the OCWA semantics of [Leonid Libkin and Cristina Sirangelo, 2011]. We define a new OCWA semantics, called OCWA*, in terms of homomorphic covers that subsumes both semantics, and characterize semantic implication and equivalence in terms of such covers. This characterization yields a guess-and-check algorithm to decide equivalence, and shows that the problem is NP-complete. For the minimization problem we show that for several common notions of minimality there is in general no unique minimal equivalent instance for Closed Powerset semantics, and consequently not for the more expressive OCWA* either. However, for Closed Powerset semantics we show that one can find, for any incomplete database, a unique finite set of its subinstances which are subinstances (up to renaming of nulls) of all instances semantically equivalent to the original incomplete one. We study properties of this set, and extend the analysis to OCWA*

Instance-Based Hyper-Tableaux for Coherent Logic

We consider a fragment of first-order logic known as coherent logic or geometric logic. The essential difference to standard clausal form is that there may be existentially quantified variables in the positive literals of a clause, and only constants and variables are allowed as terms. Coherent logic is interesting because many problems naturally fall into the fragment. Furthermore, the simple term structure might allow for efficient implementations. We propose a calculus for this fragment that extends the `next-generation' hyper-tableaux calculus of Baumgartner, and prove it sound and complete. To our knowledge, this is the first instance-based method that works on a richer input than clause normal form

Mapping Data to Ontologies with Exceptions Using Answer Set Programming

In ontology-based data access (OBDA), databases are connected to an ontology via mappings from queries over the database to queries over the ontology. In this paper, we define an ASP-based semantics for mappings from relational databases to first-order ontologies, augmented with queries over the ontology in the mapping rule bodies. The resulting formalism can be described as ”ASP modulo theories”, and can be used to express constraints and exceptions in OBDA systems, as well as being a powerful mechanism for succinctly representing OBDA mappings. Furthermore, we show that brave reasoning in this setting has either the same data complexity as ASP, or is at least as hard as the complexity of checking entailment for the ontology queries. Moreover, despite the interaction of ASP rules and the ontology, most properties of ASP are preserved. Finally, we show that for ontologies with UCQ-rewritable queries there exists a natural reduction from our framework to ASP with existential variables

Approaching OBDA Evolution through Mapping Repair

[No abstract available

Introducing LoCo, a Logic for Configuration Problems

In this paper we present the core of LoCo, a logic-based high-level representation language for expressing configuration problems. LoCo shall allow to model these problems in an intuitive and declarative way, the dynamic aspects of configuration notwithstanding. Our logic enforces that configurations contain only finitely many components and reasoning can be reduced to the task of model construction.Comment: In Proceedings LoCoCo 2011, arXiv:1108.609

Hybrid tractability of constraint satisfaction problems with global constraints

A wide range of problems can be modelled as constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs), that is, a set of constraints that must be satisfied simultaneously. Constraints can either be represented extensionally, by explicitly listing allowed combinations of values, or intensionally, whether by an equation, propositional logic formula, or other means. Intensionally represented constraints, known as global constraints, are a powerful modelling technique, and many modern CSP solvers provide them. We give examples to show how problems that deal with product configuration can be modelled with such constraints, and how this approach relates to other modelling formalisms.The complexity of CSPs with extensionally represented constraints is well understood, and there are several known techniques that can be used to identify tractable classes of such problems. For CSPs with global constraints, however, many of these techniques fail, and far fewer tractable classes are known. In order to remedy this state of affairs, we undertake a systematic review of research into the tractability of CSPs. In particular, we look at CSPs with extensionally represented constraints in order to understand why many of the techniques that give tractable classes for this case fail for CSPs with global constraints. The above investigation leads to two discoveries.First, many restrictions on how the constraints of a CSP interact implicitly rely on a property of extensionally represented constraints to guarantee tractability. We identify this property as being a bound on the number of solutions in key parts of the instance, and find classes of global constraints that also possess this property. For such classes, we show that many known tractability results apply. Furthermore, global constraints allow us to treat entire CSP instances as constraints. We combine this observation with the above result, and obtain new tractable classes of CSPs by dividing a CSP into smaller CSPs drawn from known tractable classes. Second, for CSPs that simply do not possess the above property, we look at how the constraints of an instance overlap, and how assignments to the overlapping parts extend to the rest of the problem. We show that assignments that extend in the same way can be identified. Combined with a new structural restriction, this observation leads to a second set of tractable classes.We conclude with a summary, as well as some observations about potential for future work in this area.</p